Quick Answer: The 4R38 and 4R36 share identical core specs (21,600 vph, 41-hour reserve, ±10-15 sec/day accuracy) with three differences: 4R38 has open-heart cutout at 12 o'clock exposing balance wheel (vs 4R36's closed dial), 23 jewels vs 24 (day display removed), and Presage-exclusive at $450-550 (vs 4R36 in $200-300 Seiko 5 Sports).
This comparison covers all 4R38 vs 4R36 differences, whether Presage pricing justifies open-heart aesthetics, watches using each movement, and which suits your priorities—visible mechanics versus pure value.

Quick Comparison: 4R38 vs 4R36 at a Glance
| Specification | 4R38 (Presage Open-Heart) | 4R36 (Seiko 5 Sports Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| Dial Design | Open-heart cutout at 12 o'clock | Closed solid dial |
| Jewels | 23 jewels | 24 jewels |
| Complications | Date only (at 6 o'clock or 3 o'clock) | Day-date (both day and date displays) |
| Decorative Finishing | Blued screws visible through cutout | Standard industrial finishing |
| Beat Rate | 21,600 vph (6 beats/second) | 21,600 vph (6 beats/second) |
| Power Reserve | 41 hours | 41 hours |
| Accuracy | +45/-35 sec/day (±10-15 typical) | +45/-35 sec/day (±10-15 typical) |
| Hacking Seconds | Yes | Yes |
| Hand-Winding | Yes | Yes |
| Primary Application | Presage Cocktail Time, Presage dress watches | Seiko 5 Sports, some Presage models |
| Typical Watch Pricing | $450-550 (Presage) | $200-300 (Seiko 5 Sports) |
| Crystal Type | Sapphire (most Presage models) | Hardlex (Seiko 5 Sports) |
| Service Cost | $200-300 (identical to 4R36) | $200-300 |
Bottom line: The 4R38 and 4R36 perform identically in reliability, accuracy, and longevity—choosing between them becomes a decision about aesthetics (open-heart mechanical display vs clean dial), complications (date-only vs day-date), and pricing tier (Presage dress watch refinement vs Seiko 5 Sports value).
Key Difference #1: Open-Heart vs Closed Dial Design
4R38 Open-Heart Design
The 4R38's defining feature is its open-heart dial cutout at 12 o'clock—a circular or shaped aperture exposing the balance wheel, pallet fork, escape wheel, and decorative movement components. This cutout typically measures 10-15mm in diameter, removing approximately 15-20% of the dial's solid surface while maintaining enough dial material for hour indices, branding, and date window positioning.
What you see through the 4R38's open-heart cutout:
- Oscillating balance wheel: The circular wheel with adjustment screws visible around its perimeter, oscillating back and forth at 6 beats per second (21,600 vph total)—creating hypnotic mechanical motion
- Hairspring: Delicate coiled spring attached to the balance wheel, expanding and contracting with each oscillation regulating timekeeping
- Pallet fork: Forked lever rocking between balance wheel swings, alternately catching and releasing escape wheel teeth
- Decorative blued screws: Heat-treated screws creating blue coloring through controlled oxidation—traditional watchmaking decoration technique adding luxury aesthetics
- Movement plates and bridges: Portions of top plate and balance cock (bridge securing balance wheel) visible with decorative finishing
Advantages of open-heart design:
- Visible mechanical display demonstrating automatic watchmaking without full skeleton complexity
- Educational value showing how escapement regulates timekeeping through balance wheel oscillation
- Decorative appeal creating visual depth and movement interest
- Conversation piece aesthetic generating discussion and engagement
- Maintains legibility (hour indices remain on solid dial portions for easy time reading)
Disadvantages of open-heart design:
- Dust accumulation on visible components requiring monthly compressed air cleaning
- Slightly reduced dial space limiting design flexibility for branding/text
- Not universally appreciated aesthetically (some buyers prefer clean solid dials)
- No practical timekeeping advantage over closed dials (purely aesthetic feature)
4R36 Closed Dial Design
The 4R36 uses standard closed dial architecture—solid dial material covers the entire movement with no cutouts or windows exposing internal mechanics. This traditional approach maximizes dial real estate for indices, branding, day-date complications, and design elements while hiding all movement components behind the dial.
Advantages of closed dial design:
- Maximum legibility with uninterrupted hour markers and clear dial layout
- No dust accumulation concerns (all movement components sealed behind dial)
- More dial space for complications (day-date windows, branding, text, subdials)
- Cleaner aesthetic appeal for buyers preferring minimalist designs
- Zero additional maintenance beyond standard service intervals
Disadvantages of closed dial design:
- No visible mechanical display (movement completely hidden unless watch features exhibition caseback)
- Less educational value—can't observe escapement mechanics during wearing
- Reduced visual interest compared to open-heart's kinetic movement display
Aesthetic preference decides: Neither design performs better mechanically—choosing between 4R38's open-heart and 4R36's closed dial becomes pure aesthetic preference. Watch enthusiasts appreciating visible mechanics favor 4R38, while buyers prioritizing clean minimalist dials prefer 4R36.
Key Difference #2: 23 Jewels vs 24 Jewels
Why One Fewer Jewel in 4R38?
The 4R38's 23-jewel count versus 4R36's 24 jewels results from removing the day display complication when modifying the movement for open-heart applications. The 4R36 includes both day and date displays requiring additional gearing, pivots, and jewel bearings—when Seiko created the 4R38 for Presage open-heart watches, they eliminated the day display to simplify dial layout and create space for the 12 o'clock cutout, removing one jewel bearing in the process.
The missing jewel's function: In the 4R36, the 24th jewel serves as a bearing in the day display mechanism—supporting the day disk's rotation and reducing friction during day changes at midnight. When the 4R38 removes the entire day display assembly, this jewel becomes unnecessary and is eliminated along with the associated gears and day disk.
Does fewer jewels mean lower quality? No—the jewel count difference represents functional modification, not quality reduction. All critical timekeeping jewels remain identical between 4R38 and 4R36:
| Function | Jewels Required | 4R38 | 4R36 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance wheel bearings | 4 (cap + hole jewels) | ✅ Included | ✅ Included |
| Pallet fork pivots | 2 | ✅ Included | ✅ Included |
| Gear train bearings | 8-10 | ✅ Included | ✅ Included |
| Automatic winding jewels | 4-6 | ✅ Included | ✅ Included |
| Date mechanism | 2-3 | ✅ Included | ✅ Included |
| Day mechanism | 1 | ❌ Removed | ✅ Included |
Every jewel bearing critical for accuracy, reliability, and longevity remains in the 4R38—only the complication-specific day display jewel is removed. This doesn't affect timekeeping performance: real-world accuracy, power reserve, service intervals, and reliability prove identical between 23-jewel 4R38 and 24-jewel 4R36 movements.
Date-Only vs Day-Date Complications
4R38: Date-only display
- Single date window showing current date (1-31)
- Positioned at 6 o'clock (most common) or 3 o'clock depending on dial design
- Cleaner dial symmetry without day window
- Sufficient for most users (day of week easily remembered or checked on phones)
- Creates dial space for open-heart cutout at 12 o'clock
4R36: Day-date display
- Day window showing current day of week (full name: "Monday," "Tuesday," etc.)
- Date window showing current date (1-31)
- Both positioned at 3 o'clock in side-by-side configuration, or stacked vertically
- Maximum practical functionality for users wanting both complications
- Multilingual day display (English, Spanish, French, etc. depending on market)
Practical consideration: Do you actually reference day display regularly? Many users find date sufficient for daily wear, checking day of week mentally or via smartphones when needed. Others appreciate having both complications visible at a glance—particularly retirees, travelers, or professionals tracking weekly schedules. If you rarely reference day display, 4R38's date-only configuration proves equally functional while enabling open-heart aesthetics.
Key Difference #3: Presage vs Seiko 5 Positioning
4R38: Presage-Exclusive Movement
Seiko reserves the 4R38 exclusively for Presage collection watches, never using it in Seiko 5 Sports or other value-oriented lineups despite the movements sharing core architecture. This exclusivity serves strategic product differentiation—Presage justifies $450-550 pricing through open-heart aesthetics, decorative finishing, and specification upgrades absent in budget Seiko 5 models.
Typical 4R38 Presage specifications:
- Sapphire crystal: 9 Mohs hardness scratch resistance maintaining clarity for decades
- Sunburst dial finishing: Radiating patterns creating depth and luxury aesthetics (Cocktail Time signature)
- Refined case finishing: Mixed brushed/polished surfaces versus uniform brushing
- Dress watch proportions: 40-41mm cases suited for formal contexts and smaller wrists
- Deployant clasp: Folding leather strap clasps offering convenience and strap longevity
- Decorative movement finishing: Blued screws visible through open-heart cutout
4R38 Presage examples:
- Presage Cocktail Time SSA343 (blue sunburst, $450-500)
- Presage Cocktail Time SSA345 (champagne/gold, $450-500)
- Presage Cocktail Time SSA346 (white dial, $450-500)
- Presage Sharp Edged Series open-heart models ($500-550)
4R36: Widespread Seiko 5 Sports Application
The 4R36 powers the vast majority of Seiko 5 Sports watches—Seiko's legendary value automatic collection established 1963. Seiko 5 Sports prioritizes affordability and durability over decorative refinement, creating tool watch aesthetics and specifications at $200-300 pricing.
Typical 4R36 Seiko 5 Sports specifications:
- Hardlex crystal: Seiko's proprietary mineral glass (5-6 Mohs hardness), cheaper than sapphire but accumulates scratches over 2-5 years
- Flat painted dials: Solid colors without sunburst finishing or decorative patterns
- Uniform brushed cases: Simple brushing without polished bevels or mixed finishing
- Tool watch sizing: 42-43mm cases creating bold wrist presence
- Standard buckles: Tang buckles or basic folding clasps (no deployant refinement)
- 100m water resistance: Swim-safe rating for active lifestyle durability
4R36 Seiko 5 Sports examples:
- Seiko 5 Sports SRPD (dive watch homage series, $200-280)
- Seiko 5 Sports SNZG (field watch series, $200-250)
- Seiko 5 Sports Street Fighter limited editions ($250-300)
- Countless Seiko 5 variants globally ($180-300 range)
Presage vs Seiko 5: Specification Comparison
| Feature | Presage (4R38) | Seiko 5 Sports (4R36) |
|---|---|---|
| Movement Display | Open-heart at 12 o'clock | Closed dial (no visible movement) |
| Crystal | Sapphire (most models) | Hardlex mineral glass |
| Dial Finishing | Sunburst, textured, decorative | Flat painted, simple |
| Case Size | 40-41mm (dress watch proportions) | 42-43mm (tool watch sizing) |
| Case Finishing | Mixed brushed/polished | Uniform brushing |
| Strap/Bracelet | Leather with deployant clasp | Steel bracelet or basic strap |
| Target Context | Dress watch, formal occasions | Tool watch, casual/active wear |
| Price Range | $450-550 | $200-300 |
Value analysis: The $200-250 price difference buys genuine specification upgrades—sapphire crystal alone adds $80-120 value, sunburst dial finishing adds $30-60, refined case finishing adds $20-40, open-heart modification adds $30-50, totaling $160-270 in manufacturing cost increases. Presage pricing reflects real material and finishing improvements, not just branding markup.
Performance and Reliability: Are They Identical?
Accuracy: 4R38 vs 4R36
Both movements share identical accuracy specifications and real-world performance:
Factory specification: +45 to -35 seconds per day (unadjusted)
Real-world performance: ±10-15 seconds per day typical after break-in (2-3 months), with many units achieving ±5-10 seconds per day through favorable manufacturing tolerances or watchmaker regulation
Why accuracy matches: The 4R38 and 4R36 use identical escapement components (same balance wheel, hairspring, pallet fork, escape wheel), same beat rate (21,600 vph), and same regulation mechanism. The open-heart modification and day display removal don't affect any timekeeping components—accuracy performance proves indistinguishable between movements.
Regulation potential: Both movements respond identically to watchmaker regulation ($50-100 service), typically achieving ±5-10 seconds per day through careful adjustment, occasionally ±3-5 seconds with position timing across multiple orientations.
Power Reserve: 4R38 vs 4R36
Identical 41-hour power reserve in both movements—removing the day display mechanism in 4R38 doesn't affect mainspring capacity, barrel diameter, or gear train efficiency. Both movements:
- Stop after ~41 hours when fully wound and left unworn
- Maintain adequate winding through daily 8-12 hour wearing with moderate activity
- Require manual winding or watch winder for weekend-only wearing patterns
- Support hand-winding via crown to supplement automatic winding when needed
Service Life and Maintenance: 4R38 vs 4R36
Both movements demonstrate identical service intervals and costs:
Service-free operation: 10-15 years typical under normal wearing conditions before requiring complete service (many owners report 12+ years of accurate daily wear)
Service cost: $200-300 for complete service at authorized Seiko centers or independent watchmakers—identical pricing because movements share core architecture and parts inventory
Service procedures: Watchmakers disassemble, clean, lubricate, and regulate both movements using identical techniques—the open-heart modification and day mechanism difference don't affect service complexity or time requirements
Parts availability: Both movements use interchangeable components (balance wheel, hairspring, pallet fork, gears, mainspring) ensuring global parts availability and affordable replacements
Only maintenance difference: 4R38 requires monthly compressed air cleaning to remove dust visible through open-heart cutout (30-second task), while 4R36's closed dial eliminates cosmetic dust concerns. This represents the sole practical maintenance difference—core mechanical servicing remains identical.
Which Movement Is Better for You?
Choose 4R38 Presage If You:
- Appreciate open-heart aesthetics: Value visible mechanical display and enjoy watching balance wheel oscillate during wearing
- Want sapphire crystal protection: Prioritize scratch-resistant crystals maintaining clarity for decades (most 4R38 Presage models include sapphire vs Seiko 5's Hardlex)
- Prefer dress watch proportions: Need 40-41mm sizing for smaller wrists (under 7 inches) or formal contexts versus Seiko 5's 42-43mm tool watch sizing
- Value decorative finishing: Appreciate sunburst dials, blued screws, mixed brushed/polished case finishing creating luxury aesthetics
- Date-only suffices: Don't need day display—date alone adequate for daily wear reference
- Accept monthly dust cleaning: Willing to spend 30 seconds monthly with compressed air removing dust from open-heart cutout
- Budget allows $450-550: Can afford Presage pricing for specification upgrades and open-heart complication
Choose 4R36 Seiko 5 Sports If You:
- Prioritize value over aesthetics: Want proven automatic reliability at lowest cost ($200-300) without paying premium for decorative features
- Need day-date functionality: Reference both day and date regularly—appreciate having both complications visible
- Prefer tool watch styling: Want 42-43mm cases creating bold wrist presence for casual/active contexts
- Accept Hardlex crystal trade-off: Understand Hardlex accumulates scratches over 2-5 years but accept this for budget savings (replacement costs $80-150 every 3-5 years if scratches bother you)
- Want zero extra maintenance: Prefer closed dial eliminating visible dust concerns and compressed air cleaning
- Don't value open-heart display: Indifferent to visible movement mechanics—solid dials provide cleaner aesthetics in your view
- Budget constrains under $300: Need automatic watch functionality at most affordable price point from established manufacturer
They're Equally Good If You:
- Need reliable daily automatic: Both deliver 10-15 year service-free operation and ±10-15 sec/day accuracy
- Want accessible servicing: Both cost $200-300 for complete service at any competent watchmaker
- Require hacking and hand-winding: Both include these features (absent in many budget automatics)
- Expect proven longevity: Both inherit 4R family's track record across millions of units globally since 2011
Price Difference: Is Open-Heart Worth $200-250 More?
What the Premium Buys
Typical pricing comparison:
- 4R38 Presage Cocktail Time: $450-500
- 4R36 Seiko 5 Sports: $200-280
- Price difference: $200-250
Value breakdown of the $200-250 premium:
| Upgrade | Manufacturing Cost | User Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Sapphire crystal | +$80-120 | Scratch resistance maintaining clarity 10+ years vs Hardlex's 2-5 years |
| Open-heart modification | +$30-50 | Visible mechanical display, blued screws, aesthetic interest |
| Sunburst dial finishing | +$30-60 | Depth and luxury aesthetics vs flat painted dials |
| Case finishing | +$20-40 | Mixed brushed/polished surfaces vs uniform brushing |
| Deployant clasp | +$15-25 | Convenience and leather strap longevity |
| Total added value | $175-295 | Genuine specification improvements justifying premium |
Is it worth it?
Yes, if: You value sapphire crystal protection ($80-120 of the premium alone), appreciate open-heart aesthetics creating conversation-piece appeal, need dress watch proportions and refinement for formal contexts, and budget comfortably accommodates $450-550 spending. The premium buys real material upgrades—not just branding markup.
No, if: You prioritize pure value and reliability over decorative features, indifferent to open-heart display, willing to accept Hardlex scratching over 3-5 years, prefer tool watch styling, or budget constrains under $300. The 4R36 Seiko 5 Sports delivers identical mechanical performance at 40-60% cost savings—spending an extra $200-250 buys aesthetics and materials, not better timekeeping.
Alternative Consideration: 4R38 Presage vs NH38 Custom Mods
A third option exists: custom watch mods using NH38 movements (third-party designation for 4R38—functionally identical, sold to modders instead of reserved for Seiko-branded watches).
NH38 custom mod advantages:
- Same open-heart functionality as 4R38 (identical movement architecture)
- Often includes sapphire crystal at $300-400 pricing (versus Presage's $450-550)
- Unique designs unavailable in Seiko's official catalogs (skeleton dials, custom colorways)
- Customization flexibility (dial, hands, case, strap options)
NH38 custom mod trade-offs:
- No official Seiko warranty (versus Presage's manufacturer coverage)
- Build quality variance depending on modder reputation
- Lower resale value versus official Seiko models
- Less accessible service (may need to return to original builder)
For buyers prioritizing sapphire + open-heart at lowest cost, NH38 custom mods offer compelling value at $300-400—sacrificing official branding and warranty for material specifications matching or exceeding 4R38 Presage at lower pricing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the 4R38 more accurate than the 4R36?
No. Both share identical timekeeping components—same balance wheel, hairspring, escapement, 21,600 vph beat rate. Both carry +45/-35 sec/day factory spec, achieve ±10-15 sec/day real-world. The open-heart cutout is purely aesthetic; day mechanism removal doesn't affect accuracy. For better accuracy, upgrade to 6R or Grand Seiko calibers.
Does the 4R38 have better build quality than the 4R36?
Movements themselves are identical—same specs, interchangeable parts, 10-15 year reliability. The difference is at watch level: Presage ($450-550) includes sapphire crystal, sunburst dials, refined finishing; Seiko 5 ($200-300) uses Hardlex and simpler finishing. 4R38 has decorative blued screws visible through open-heart—aesthetic, not functional improvement.
Can you see the movement better in 4R38 than 4R36?
Yes, dramatically. The 4R38's 12 o'clock open-heart cutout exposes balance wheel, pallet fork, and blued screws—visible escapement operation during daily wear. The 4R36 uses closed dial hiding all components. Some 4R36 watches have exhibition casebacks showing rotor, but that requires flipping the watch over and shows different components.
Which movement lasts longer: 4R38 or 4R36?
Both identical—expect 10-15 year service-free operation, many units running 12-20+ years. They share identical core components: mainspring, gear train, escapement, jewel bearings. The 4R38's open-heart modification doesn't create additional wear—purely dial-side aesthetic. Service intervals and parts longevity match exactly.
Should I buy 4R38 Presage or 4R36 Seiko 5 for first automatic watch?
For first automatic, 4R36 Seiko 5 Sports offers better value—start at $200-300 testing whether automatics suit your lifestyle before investing $450-550 in Presage. Seiko 5 provides identical mechanical experience at lower cost. First-time buyers often underestimate accuracy variance versus quartz and wearing discipline. After 6-12 months, you'll know if aesthetic upgrades matter. Exception: if wanting open-heart from day one with comfortable budget, buy Presage—4R38 performs identically in reliability.
Conclusion
The 4R38 and 4R36 deliver identical mechanical performance—21,600 vph, 41-hour reserve, ±10-15 sec/day accuracy, 10-15 year service life. Differences exist only in aesthetics (open-heart vs closed dial), complications (date-only vs day-date), and watch-level specs (Presage sapphire vs Seiko 5 Hardlex).
The $200-250 Presage premium buys genuine upgrades: sapphire crystal ($80-120 value), sunburst dial finishing, open-heart modification, refined case finishing. These are tangible material improvements, not branding markup.
Choose 4R38 Presage for open-heart aesthetics, sapphire protection, and dress watch refinement at $450-550. Choose 4R36 Seiko 5 for maximum value at $200-300 with day-date functionality. Both prove equally reliable—the decision hinges on aesthetics and budget, not mechanical performance.
0 comments
Leave a comment